Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched a forceful investigation into a real estate project
The post SHARIA WILL NOT PASS! Texas Confronts the Islamic Real Estate Project with a Firm Hand appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Earlier this week, two strong election integrity voices from Michigan, Ramon Jackson and Pastor Lorenzo Sewell, came in and testified before Rep. Rachelle Smit’s Election Integrity Committee, as part of Smit’s effort to document evidence of voter fraud in Michigan’s past election cycles.
Yesterday TGP’s Patty McMurray covered the hearing in detail, showing how the two activists spent months documenting Detroit voter fraud and figuring out exactly how Democrats are committing the fraud. And again today TGP’s Patty McMurray went into more detail covering the way in which this systemic voter fraud happened.
The Democrat voter fraud scheme is to use an identified transient population, people who often move and change addresses, using those people for absentee ballots. The Detroit activists have documented people who voted in-person on days they were out-of-state, and people who are said to have voted from addresses that they have long ago left. They also documented ballots cast in the name of people who were living in other states, and voting in other states, without a Michigan driver’s license.
Democrats are now responding with name-calling and by employing their media allies to use racist tropes to dismiss these activists.
Democrats have responded and their only argument is to use epithets and racially-coded-language that these courageous men are “election deniers” and seeking to reimpose a racist ‘poll tax’ to deny blacks the right to vote.
Chair of the Michigan Democratic Party Curtis Hertel
White Democrats are telling Black leaders that they are racist for wanting to protect their right to vote, and the right for their votes to count.
You can hear the sneering elite condescension in their left-wing voices as they talk down to the Detroit activists seeking to protect their integrity, identity, and political choices.
“The election deniers in today’s committee hearing are yet another sign that Michigan Republicans are untethered from fact and reality when it comes to our elections,” said Chair of the Michigan Democratic Party Curtis Hertel said in a press release. “Along with the poll tax bills that jeopardize thousands of voters’ access to the ballot box, Michigan Republicans are making it clear that safe and secure elections are not their goal.”
Here is the press release from Michigan’s Democrat Party:
What they found was that a certain type of resident was having their votes and identities stolen. Likely through the ERIC system, a segment of the population that are largely transient and who often move, were having their votes taken. This population does not live in one spot, but it is very difficult to prove where they lived at a specific time
Democrats are trying to pressure Rep. Rachelle Smit to drop this line of investigation, because they claim, it’s not what they ran for office on. Rep. Stephen Wooden (D-Grand Rapids) further complained that claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were already five years old and so it was of little interest or consequence.
Democrat detractors pointed out in the MIRS News service, a special high-priced blog catering to Michigan’s lobbyists, using a variety of scare quotes and demeaning language to marginalize and silence these Black voices speaking the truth: that the 2020 election was riddled with systemic voter fraud.
Statehouse news reporting often launders Democrat priorities through this process: where glorified blogs like MIRS News put a far-left spin on inconvenient facts for Democrats. Then local outlets and state bloggers, in Michigan’s case an example here would be the Detroit News’ discredited and disgraced Craig Mauger, to then report on MIRS’ original reporting. Then national outlets like the Associated Press, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, simply regurgitate the narrative framing and dismissive tones of the original work.
Head of the Michigan Democrats Curtis Hertel, and his allies at MIRS News, work together to use racist tropes in order to dismiss the claims of these impassioned Detroit activists.
Here’s a snapshot of the 701 word article about the incident in MIRS News:
Here is a summary of MIRS’ coverage and the way it is meant to undermine and dismiss these voter fraud witnesses:
Stereotyping of these Black religious leaders as grifters or hucksters.
Mockery of Black vernacular or preaching styles.
Undermining legitimacy through dishonest framing (linking them to President Trump, highlighting the lawsuit dismissal, noting the request for donations).
Gatekeeping via establishment voices questioning the right of these individuals to speak or be taken seriously.
These are the tactics that the Democrats and the media are going to use to suppress these courageous Detroit whistleblowers who are documenting the systemic voter fraud in 2020 that shifted Michigan from a Trump win to a Trump loss utilizing absentee ballot fraud, among other tactics, to deliver the election to Joe Biden and his allies.
The post White Dems Tell Detroit Black Election Integrity Activists they are “Dangerous,” “Extreme,” pushing “Poll Taxes” for Speaking up about 2020 Voter Fraud appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) crew have revealed that 40%—nearly half—of the phone calls the Social Security Administration receives are from “fraudsters” who are changing beneficiaries’ bank information to steal benefits.
“When you want to change your bank account, you can call Social Security. We learned 40% of the phone calls that they get are from fraudsters,” one of Musk’s prodigies stated.
President Trump’s DOGE head, Elon Musk, and members of his team sat for an interview with Bret Baier, which aired on Thursday evening, to discuss the waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending that they’ve uncovered in just two months.
Musk explained that unscrupulous individuals “call in, they say, they claim to be a retiree, then they convince the Social Security personnel to change where the money is flowing.”
“It actually goes to some fraudster,” he added.
WATCH:
DOGE Engineer: The two improvements that we’re trying to make to Social Security are helping people that legitimately get benefits protect them from fraud that they experience every day on a routine basis, and also make the experience better. And I’ll give you— one example is at Social Security one of the first things we learned is that they get phone calls every day of people trying to change direct deposit information.
So, when you want to change your bank account, you can call Social Security. We learned 40% of the phone calls that they get are from fraudsters… almost half.
Musk: Yes, and they steal people’s social security is what happens. They call in, they say, they claim to be a retiree, then they convince the Social Security personnel to change where the money is flowing. It actually goes to some fraudster. This is happening all day, every day, and then somebody doesn’t receive their Social Security; it’s because of all the fraud loopholes in the Social Security system.
Other findings by the team regarding Social Security reveal what a scam the program is.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that the DOGE team had discovered jaw-dropping inconsistencies within the U.S. Social Security database. According to their findings, over 25 million Americans are registered as aged 100 or older—some allegedly older than the U.S. Constitution itself.
DOGE recently announced that as part of their massive clean-up effort, they’ve marked Social Security recipients aged 120 and older as deceased.
Despite the massive fraud in the program and evidence of real retirees getting cheated out of their benefits, the Democrats are still vehemently opposed to Musk and his team rooting out the corruption.
How many elected Democrats are benefiting in some way from all of this fraud?
The post (VIDEO) Elon Musk and DOGE Team Reveal that NEARLY HALF of Social Security Calls are from “Fraudsters” Stealing Social Security Benefits appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Jeffrey Goldberg
The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg gave somewhat of a cryptic response when CBS News asked him about his relationship with National Security Advisor Mike Waltz.
President Trump, for now, is standing by his National Security Advisor Mike Waltz after Deep State reporter Jeffrey Goldberg was added to a Signal chat group.
However, Mike Waltz’s relationship with Jeffrey Goldberg has come into question after a screenshot of the Signal group clearly shows Waltz added The Atlantic editor to the “Houthi PC small group.”
Full Signal text chain has been released.
There’s nothing in it but the pros and cons of striking now vs waiting a month.
It’s not war plans. It’s not classified info.
It’s a conversation, and nice to see cabinet members and staffers hashing out the best way to move forward.… pic.twitter.com/OTNYgHr3VP
— Shawn Farash (@Shawn_Farash) March 26, 2025
It was reported on Monday that Jeffrey Goldberg, the anti-Trump editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, claimed he was accidentally added to a secure Signal group chat where top Trump administration officials discussed sensitive military operations against Iran-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen.
According to Jeffrey Goldberg, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President JD Vance were in a Signal group called “Houthi PC small group,” discussing plans to strike terrorists in Yemen.
After the first release of chats from the Signal group, Jeffrey Goldberg vowed to release the ‘war plans’ discussed in the text chain.
Goldberg released the second round of messages from the chat group on Wednesday at it was clear that he over promised and under delivered.
Although no war plans were discussed in the “Houthi PC small group” on Signal, the main question is, how did Mike Waltz add Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat group if he insists he has never spoken to him? How was Jeffrey Goldberg in his phone contacts?
On Tuesday evening, Mike Waltz said he takes full responsibility for what happened since he is the one who created the Signal chat group.
Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham could not understand how Jeffrey Goldberg ended up in Mike Waltz’s phone in the first place if he has never spoken to him before.
“But you’ve never talked to him [Jeffrey Goldberg] before, so how’s the number on your phone?” Laura Ingraham asked Waltz.
Waltz replied, “Well, if you have somebody else’s contact and then somehow it gets sucked in, it gets sucked in.”
Although Mike Waltz insists he has never spoken to Jeffrey Goldberg, it appears they might actually know each other.
According to investigative reporter Paul Sperry, Mike Waltz was a source for Jeffrey Goldberg while he was serving on the House Intel Committee.
Per Paul Sperry: Though Waltz insists, “I wasn’t talking to [Goldberg],” a US intel official told me Waltz was a source for Goldberg while on HPSCI. “There’s no need for an investigation to figure out how he was added to the chat.Goldberg was in his address book b/c he’s been talking to him”
Additionally, Mike Waltz attended an event moderated by Jeffrey Goldberg in 2021.
Waltz was photographed standing near Goldberg.
Michael Waltz claimed that he’s “never met, don’t know, never communicated with” Jeffrey Goldberg.
Here’s a photo of Waltz standing next to Goldberg during a 2021 event at the French Embassy.
The event Waltz attended—a Q&A with a French filmmaker—was moderated by Goldberg. pic.twitter.com/eTqOY7xnTl
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) March 26, 2025
Jeffrey Goldberg raised eyebrows when asked about his relationship with Mike Waltz.
“I’m just not going to comment on my relationship with Mike Waltz,” Jeffrey Goldberg told CBS News in an interview Wednesday.
When asked about the photos of him standing near Mike Waltz at an event in 2021, Goldberg said, “If your eyeballs see us together, then I guess your eyeballs are seeing us together.”
The post Jeffrey Goldberg Gives Cryptic Response When Asked About His Relationship with Mike Waltz appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
The drama surrounding President Donald Trump’s top defense team this week is getting a backstage twist.
Minnesota Democrat Ilhan Omar, one of the most polarizing members of the polarizing group known as the “squad,” is shopping plans behind the scenes to launch impeachment efforts as a result of the controversy that’s become known as “Signalgate,” according to the Beltway-centric news outlets Axios.
Omar’s targets are some of the biggest names in Trump’s administration, but the online backlash might not be quite what she was expecting.
According to the Axios report Thursday, which cited unnamed sources, Omar is trying to convince fellow Democrats behind the scenes to move forward with impeaching Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
All three were part of a chat group on the encrypted messaging app Signal that discussed a March 15 strike by the United States military on the Houthi terrorist group in Yemen. Also in that group, included accidentally, was Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of the liberal magazine The Atlantic. Goldberg is a journalist with a history of attacking Trump.
(He was the man who publicized the claim that Trump had insulted American Marines who gave their lives during World War I.)
When Goldberg published a report about the Yemen conversation in The Atlantic on Monday, he unleashed the young Trump administration’s most serious controversy to date. It’s a controversy that has stirred Omar to start talking impeachment, according to Axios.
“The high-profile progressive has been pushing the idea of impeachment among fellow House Democrats, a senior House Democrat and another source familiar with the matter told Axios,” the outlet reported.
Considering that any impeachment effort against the Trump administration is virtually certain to fail in the current Congress, where Republicans hold a majority in both the House and the Senate, the motivation for Omar to act isn’t the likelihood of success.
Instead, it’s more likely a public relations exercise — political theater to paint Trump as a villain and show his supporting cast in the worst possible light.
But with reactions on the social media platform X showing an overwhelming majority of commenters blasting Omar, an impeachment stunt is likely to only backfire for Democrats as a whole.
A quick survey of X found only a single post supporting Omar. That post — from a leftist social media activist — was quickly inundated with responses attacking her or defending the Trump officials.
Outside of that post, the rest were ridiculing Omar, a native of Somalia and one of only two Muslim women to serve in Congress. (The other is fellow “squad” member Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat.)
Here’s a fair sampling of the reaction as a whole, as of about 4:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time:
Ilhan Omar is drafting articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth, Michael Waltz, and John Ratcliffe.
She claims it’s because of ‘Signalgate,’ but let’s be real—she’s just upset they successfully took out Houthi terrorists. pic.twitter.com/PEZqGWaQwO
— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) March 27, 2025
Not going anywhere. Just another dem stunt.
— Patti Gillihan (@PattiGillihan) March 27, 2025
Omar’s latest stunt proves she’s more focused on tearing down America than actually serving it. Instead of impeachment, how about we start with expelling her from Congress and sending her packing? That’d be a win for the country.
— Make Men Great Again (@OneXOneY) March 27, 2025
Nut job, some one please let her know who has the majority in Congress. I think she doesn’t know how the system they like to use really works.
— Sunny (@Sunny02214568) March 27, 2025
(To be fair, the story got a much friendlier reception from posts on Bluesky. But a liberal silo of a social media platform created specifically to be of, by and for the lefties is not exactly a reflection of America writ large.)
Omar has a history of being melodramatically partisan. It’s possible that Democrats as a whole better understand the realities of majority rule in Congress better than the Minnesota rep and her far-left “squad” members.
In its report, Axios cited a Democratic leadership source who called it an “unlikely scenario” that the party would attempt impeachment proceedings while in the minority in the House.
If that’s the case, the 2026 midterms are still 18 months away, but getting more important by the day.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
The post Ilhan Omar Initiating Impeachment Efforts for Multiple Trump Admin Officials: Report appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Judge James Boasberg / screen image
Judge James Boasberg held a hearing on Thursday afternoon in the lawsuit filed against Trump Administration officials for their use of the double-encrypted app Signal.
As previously reported, the left-wing watchdog group American Oversight filed a lawsuit against John Ratcliffe, Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard, and others, claiming their use of the Signal app violates the Presidential Records Act.
American Oversight boasts about its ‘activist litigation’ targeting Republican interests, especially the Trump Administration.
Now they’re suing Trump officials for using Signal to communicate about ‘military actions.’
According to Jeffrey Goldberg, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President JD Vance were in a Signal group called “Houthi PC small group,” discussing plans to strike terrorists in Yemen.
Rather than immediately exiting the chat group, Goldberg took screenshots and published a report in The Atlantic.
Source: The Atlantic
Judge Boasberg began the hearing on Thursday by insisting he was randomly assigned to the Signal case.
Boasberg ordered the agencies who participated in the group chat with Jeffrey Goldberg to preserve their Signal messages between March 11-15.
UPDATE: Judge Boasberg has ordered the agencies who participated in the Signalgate chat to preserve all Signal messages between March 11-15 and to provide an update to the court about efforts to do so.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) March 27, 2025
The post Judge Boasberg Orders All Agencies Involved in Chat Group with Jeffrey Goldberg to Preserve Signal Messages Between March 11-15 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
U.S.-Canada Flight Bookings Have Totally Collapsed amid Ongoing Trade War — Down by Over 75 Percent!
Airplane taking off / Grok AI
Bookings for commercial flights between the U.S. and Canada have absolutely collapsed amid rising tensions between the two countries.
Amid the imposition of tariffs on Canadian goods and Trump’s desire to make Canada the 51st state, the number of bookings hs fallen by a staggering 75.7 percent.
One Mile at a Time, a news outlet that covers trends in the travel industry, has all the details:
Aviation analytics company OAG has published some data on the decline in flight bookings between the countries, and it’s worse than most people probably imagined. Specifically, the company compared summer season bookings in March 2024 vs. March 2025.
In other words, at this point in both years, how many people have booked transborder flights in April through September?
Well, I hope you’re sitting down. For that six month period, the number of tickets booked is down anywhere from 71.4% to 75.7%. Just as an example, April is less than a week away, and here’s how bookings between the two countries are looking:
In March 2024, 1,218,570 tickets had been booked for April 2024
In March 2025, 295,982 tickets have been booked for April 2025
That represents a 75.7% reduction in tickets booked.
The report also notes airlines have already reduced the number of scheduled flights 3.5 percent,adding that this “level of demand shift is something you almost never see.”
Yet should this trend continue, airlines will need to make radical overhauls to their flight schedules to align with the massive fall in demand.
Historically, the two countries have enjoyed one of the busiest air corridors in the world, with millions of travelers moving for business, tourism, and family visits.
While relations between Canada and the U.S. may currently be at their lowest point in years, that could soon change if the Conservative Party of Canada triumphs at next month’s general election.
The Conservative Party leader, Pierre Poilievre, is far more ideologically aligned with the Trump administration than Liberal Party leader Mark Carney, who only recently took over from the long-standing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
However, the likelihood of this happening has fallen in recent months as the commanding lead that Poilievre once had in the polls has diminished.
Carney, meanwhile, is warning that he needs “clear mandate” to push back against the Trump, argiung that his administration “wants to break us so America will own us.”
The post U.S.-Canada Flight Bookings Have Totally Collapsed amid Ongoing Trade War — Down by Over 75 Percent! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
President Trump: It’s great to have you here to celebrate Women’s History Month. It’s a
The post Celebrating Female Leadership in America’s Golden Age appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
King Charles suffered an adverse reaction from the medication to fight Cancer.
For more than a year, now, King Charles III of Britain has been battling an undisclosed form of cancer that has necessitated him undergoing heavy treatment.
The 76-year-old Monarch has continued fulfilling his duties, ‘such as reviewing government papers and meeting with the prime minister’, even though he at first had to take some time off public appearances.
Today, the King suffered a health scare that had him taken to the hospital for a few hours.
Associated Press reported:
“King Charles III was hospitalized for observation on Thursday after experiencing ‘temporary side effects’, related to a scheduled cancer treatment, Buckingham Palace said in a statement.
His engagements for Thursday afternoon and Friday were canceled.”
The King has returned to Clarence House after treatment in the Hospital.
“His majesty has now returned to Clarence House and as a precautionary measure, acting on medical advice, tomorrow’s diary programme will also be rescheduled. His majesty would like to send his apologies to all those who may be inconvenienced or disappointed as a result.”
NBC news reported:
“’Following scheduled and ongoing medical treatment for cancer this morning, The King experienced temporary side effects that required a short period of observation in hospital’, Buckingham Palace said in a statement.”
A painting depicting ailing King Charles
New York Times reported:
“Charles has returned to an active schedule in recent months, playing host to foreign leaders like President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, and visiting an aircraft carrier, the H.M.S. Prince of Wales. But the palace has offered no updates on his prognosis or the nature of his treatment. His cancer was discovered during surgery for an enlarged prostate last February; the palace has said that he does not have prostate cancer but has offered no other details about his illness.
That is in contrast to his daughter-in-law, Catherine, Princess of Wales, who also was diagnosed with cancer last year, but announced in January that after several months of chemotherapy, that she was now cancer free.”
Read more:
The post King Charles Experiences Side Effects From His Cancer Treatment, Is Taken to the Hospital for Observation appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
During a House Oversight Committee hearing on Wednesday, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Chairwoman of the Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) Subcommittee, revealed perhaps the most outrageous cost for taxpayers courtesy of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
Greene’s subcommittee held a hearing Wednesday with testimony by National Public Radio (NPR) CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger as the Committee seeks to defund the far-left state propaganda stations.
During the hearing, Greene played a clip of a drag queen featured on PBS’s programming for children as young as three years old, singing and indoctrinating the young viewers. This came after PBS CEO Paula Kerger claimed that this program never aired and was posted on their website “mistakenly” but taken down “immediately.”
Radical Democrats have learned nothing from the last election and are still fighting for they/them, instead of you. Throughout the hearing, they defended this depravity, decried Republicans for exposing the garbage that taxpayers are funding and ranted about saving Elmo. Far-left dummy Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) lost it at one point and went on a vulgar race-baiting tirade, where she called the GOP’s agenda “bullsh*t.”
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Greene grilled Maher and Kerger early in the hearing, questioning Maher’s radical anti-Trump statements and woke programming on PBS, which featured transgender teenagers and one film titled “Racist Trees.”
Later in the hearing, Rep. Will Timmons (R-SC) asked Kerger about the station’s transgender programming for children, and lied, saying that “The drag queen was actually not on any of our kids shows. The image that that Chairman Taylor Greene showed was from a project that our New York City station did with the New York City Department of Education… It did not air.”
She continued, “It was mistakenly put on our website by our New York City Station. It was not intended for national distribution. It was immediately pulled down. It was never broadcast.”
Timmons further grilled Kerger on the “Racist Trees” segment, which aired on PBS, and she denied knowing anything about the program.
WATCH:
As Congresswoman Greene then pointed out, “Ms. Kerger lied under oath and said it wasn’t featured on PBS.” She continued, “This show was aired on PBS on April 1, 2021.”
Greene further showed the receipts from PBS’s website, revealing that the disgusting clip, featured in the so-called educational programming for children, was not “immediately pulled down,” as Kerger claims, but expired nearly two months after it first aired.
The clip that Greene played for the Committee shows the “predator” cross-dresser luring young children by singing a spin-off of ‘Wheels on the Bus’ and shaking his hips and shoulders, and showing a close-up shot of his mouth.
“We’re going to start with our hips,” he says before singing, “the hips on the drag queen, go, swish, swish, swish, swish, swish, swish” and “the shoulders on the drag queen, go, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy.”
“The mouth on the drag queen goes blah blah blah all through the town.”
“That’s repulsive. That’s not what children, ages three to eight, should ever be watching,” Green said in disgust.
Watch below:
Greene: As mentioned earlier, PBS was the outlet that featured the child predator drag queen on the education show for kids ages three to eight years old. And to clarify the record, because our witness, Ms. Kerger, lied under oath and said it wasn’t featured on PBS. This show was aired on PBS on April 1, 2021. And we will take a look at this video right now.
The hips go, swish, swish, swish? The shoulders go shimmy, shimmy, shimmy? That’s repulsive. That’s not what children, ages three to eight should ever be watching; a grown, biological man, posing as a woman. And by the way, Ms. Kerger, that was aired on April 1, 2021, and then something happened. It wasn’t an accident, and it wasn’t just for a brief time that it was up. It was aired on April 1, and then somehow it expired on May 24. Later on, it was taken down. I wonder why. I wonder why that was taken down.
The post WATCH: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Plays SICK PBS Programming That Indoctrinates 3 Year-Old-Children With Drag Queens After PBS CEO Lies Under Oath in DOGE Hearing appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.